James CliffordAllegory prompts us to say of any cultural description not 'this represents, or symbolizes, that' but rather, 'this is a (morally charged) story about that'.
Articulation is a way of seeing cultures as articulated series of joints and not as living bodies with organic structures. Doing so allows us to accept that, as a collection of joints, no joint is firmly anchored so that groups can (and do) assemble and reassemble, shelf, and re-introduce their cultural identities in the present from various materials of their collective past.
Articulation is mode of analysis which makes questions of a culture's authenticity secondary by promoting the notion that a community is no less a community even though it is constantly engaged in hooking and unhooking, making and remaking -in other words, articulating -the various cultural forms that constitute it.
Authenticity is that which (wrongly) tends to be produced by removing objects and customs from their situation.
Authenticity is wrongheadedly produced in museums by removing objects from their situations.
Cultural poesis is suggesting a role for 'poetry in ethnography, however, it should be kept in mind that poetry is not limited to romantic or modernist subjectivism: It can be historical, precise, objective. And of course it is just as conventional and institutionally determined as 'prose'.
Cultural poesis is the constant reconstitution of selves and others through specific exclusions, conventions, and discursive practices.
Culture is composed of seriously contested codes and representations rather than of ideology.
Culture is neither an object to be described nor a unified corpus of symbols and meanings that can be definitively interpreted. It is is contested, temporal, and emergent, such that its study requires a thoroughly historicist and self-reflexive stance.
A Culture is not a scientific object. It is produced historically and is actively contested.
Culture is the re-constitution of selves through specific exclusions, conventions, and discursive practices.
Ethnographic authority is a term referring to the ways in which authority over cultural representation has been shaped in ethnographic practices over the last century and how in the 19600s that authority came to be challenged or dispersed.
Ethnographic writing is best when it obliges writers to find diverse ways of rendering negotiated realities as multisubjective, power-laden, and incongruent.
Ethnographic writing is contextually determined: It draws from and creates meaningful social milieux.
Ethnographic writing is generically determined: An ethnography is usually distinguishable from a novel or a travel account.
Ethnographic writing is historically determined: All the above conventions and constraints are changing.
Ethnographic writing is institutionally determined: One writes within, and against, specific traditions, disciplines, audiences.
Ethnographic writing is politically determined: The authority to represent cultural realities is unequally shared and at times contested.
Ethnographic writing is rhetorically determined: It uses and is used by expressive conventions.
Ethnography is a fiction, which is not a falsehood, per se, but something systematic and exclusive which is made or fashioned against the backdrop of the partiality of cultural and historical truths.
