Artificial intelligence (n.) is a flawed idea because human problem solving and expertise depend on our background sense of the context, of what is important and interesting given the situation, rather than on the process of searching through combinations of possibilities to find what we need.
Artificial intelligence (n.) is wrong about epistemology because the mind cannot be viewed as a device operating on bits of information according to formal rules.
Artificial intelligence (n.) is wrong about epistemology in that the world does not consist of independent facts that can be represented by independent symbols.
Artificial intelligence (n.) is wrong about human biology because intelligence is not in fact based on a brain that processes information in discrete operations by way of some biological equivalent of on/off switches.
Artificial intelligence (n.) is wrong about human psychology because the mind is not a device operating on bits of information according to formal rules.
Artificial intelligence (n.) is hopeless enterprise because a computer is incapable of getting started in the hermeneutic circle of picking out something relevant to a situation, because, unlike us, it has no situation. We, for our part, are always already attuned to a situation.
Artificial intelligence (n.) is at odds with an important problem; the everyday, that is, the non-reflective understanding of things that people take for granted.
Artificial intelligence (n.) is flawed because a computer cannot be programmed to pick out what is relevant or not in an everyday situation; because an AI is, unlike human intelligence, not always already in some situation.