Contingency (n.) of a form, where reason finds no necessity, is itself what makes us think the thing could only have come from reason.
Contingency (n.) of everything would sink the entire whole into the abyss of nothingness, unless something subsisting for itself outside it supported it and secured its continuation.
Contingency (n.) makes 'everything contingent has a cause' evident from concepts only because one has quietly defined the contingent as what can exist only as a consequence — and then it is analytic.
Contingency (n.) of the universe has its foremost proof in organized beings — for plain folk and philosophers alike the only real argument that it depends on a Being outside the world.
Contingency (n.) has a grave-sounding principle: 'everything contingent has a cause' steps forth as if it had its own dignity, but ask what 'contingent' means and you get only a lame appeal to a logical condition.
Contingency (n.) in the pure sense means the contradictory opposite was possible at the very same time — and change never proves that, since motion now and rest later are not contradictories.
Contingency (n.) is not why things need a ground; we infer contingency from the fact that every state requires a ground — and absolutely contingent would be what has no sufficient ground, which never occurs here.
Contingency (n.) is not proved by the actuality of the opposite: a body's rest after motion does not show its motion was contingent; one would have to show it could have been at rest then instead.
Contingency (n.) of everything in nature can coexist perfectly well with a necessary ground outside it: thoroughgoing contingency and an intelligible necessary being are not truly contradictory.