An Object (n.) in appearance is that which contains the condition of the necessary rule of apprehension — the rule that makes one way of combining the manifold necessary.
An Object (n.) is what explains why other people's judgments must agree with mine: without the unity of an object they all refer to, there would be no reason for them to harmonize.
An Object (n.) cannot be explained as another representation standing behind our representations, for that would only raise anew the question how that representation goes beyond itself.
An Object (n.) always remains unknown in itself; it is determined only through the universally valid connection that the understanding gives to our representations.
An Object (n.) distinct from all our representations is nothing for us — a mere X; the unity it seems to demand is in fact nothing but the formal unity of consciousness in synthesizing the manifold.