Power (n.) is a web of force relations. It is everywhere because it comes from everywhere, not because it embraces everything.
Power (n.) is both repressive and creative.
Power (n.) is everywhere because it comes from everywhere.
Power (n.) is everywhere' and 'comes from everywhere' so in this sense it is neither an agency nor a structure. It is instead a 'metapower' or a 'regime of truth' that pervades society and which is in constant flux and negotiation.
Power (n.) is exercised throughout the social body at the most micro levels of social relations and is omnipresent at every level.
Power (n.) is, in Foucault's writings, mirrored in his very discursive strategy as a kind of generating spiral that is no longer a despotic architecture but a filiation en abyme, coil and strophe without origin (without catastrophe, either), unfolding ever more widely and rigorously... but on the other hand, an interstitial flowing of power that seeps through the whole porous network of the social, the mental, and of bodies, infinitesimally modulating the technologies of power (where the relations of power and
Power (n.) is, in Foucault's writings, mirrored in his very discursive strategy as a magistral art of decentering allows the opening of new spaces which are immediately covered up by the meticulous outpourings of foucault's writings.
Power (n.) is less a confrontation between two adversaries or the linking of one to the other than a question of government, whereby to govern is to structure the possible field of action of others.
Power (n.) is less about a confrontation between, or a linking of, two adversaries. It is about regulating the conduct of conduct.
Power (n.) is not a constraining act of violence that represses, forcing individuals to do something or preventing them from doing some other thing.
Power (n.) is not a force that says no. Rather it traverses and produces things, it induces pleasure, forms knowledge, produces discourse. It needs to be considered as a productive network which runs through the whole social body, much more than as a negative instance whose function is repression.
Power (n.) is not a thing, rather it takes place. It takes place when there is a relation between two free subjects. It shifts and changes along with changes in the economic, social, political, and personal relationship.
Power (n.) is not an institution, and not a structure... neither is it a certain strength we are endowed with... it is the name that one attributes to a complex strategical situation in a particular society.
Power (n.) is strategic and war-like in the way it exercises itself.
Power's (n.) limit is death. Power works through its unfolding and death is the most secret, the most private aspect of existence, and thus, is the one moment that escapes power.
Power (n.) manifests itself in resistance to it which serves to validate it.
Power's (n.) exercise itself creates and causes new objects of knowledge to emerge and accumulates new bodies of information.
Power's (n.) success is proportional to its ability to hide its own mechanisms.
Power (n.) is impossible without resistence — where there is power, there is resistance.
Power (n.) is that on the basis of which human beings already understand each other.