Religion (n.) held in contempt is the surest sign that a province is decaying.
Religion (n.) is the quality it is most necessary for a prince to seem to have.
Religion (n.) is so powerful an ordinance that it holds a state together no matter how its princes behave and live.
Religion (n.) supplies the divine sanction without which unusual laws are never accepted, because the wise see goods whose reasons others will not follow.
Religion (n.) was Numa's instrument for taming a fierce people: Romans came to fear breaking an oath more than breaking the law.
Religion (n.) was, for Machiavelli, a lawgiver's tool: no great legislator ever governed without claiming a god behind him.
Religion (n.) wisely used helped reduce the city and restore the tribuneship to the nobles, ends that could not well have been reached without it.
Religion (n.) was Ferdinand of Aragon's cloak: always pleading it, he drove out the Moors with pious cruelty and under the same cloak assailed Africa, Italy and France.
Religion (n.) should be fostered by rulers even when they think it untrue — and the wiser they are and the better they know natural causes, the more they should foster it.
Religion (n.) has not made the world effeminate — its interpreters have, reading it for idleness and ease when it permits, even commands, the love and defence of one's country.
Religion (n.) must come before arms: where religion is established you can easily bring in arms, but where there are arms without religion it is hard to bring religion in.
Religion (n.) when new first sets out to efface the old, burning the poets and historians, breaking the images and destroying every trace of antiquity, and it failed to erase the Gentiles only because Latin forced the new law to be written in the old tongue.