Definitions HQ

Revelation (n.) offers ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠clarification but not a formula.

Revelation (n.) of ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠God is a sounding that is already a fading away — Klingen already Abklingen.

Revelation (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠God's coming out toward man shut up in his ipseity — presence ever renewed, that is, love.

Revelation (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠transcendent because the epiphany comes in the saying of the one who received it.

Revelation (n.) should ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠be thought not as received knowledge but as an awakening — the Other disturbing the Same asleep in its identity.

Revelation (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠God's love for singular man — not love first and then Revelation: Revelation is this love.

Revelation (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠a being telling itself to us independently of any position we take toward it — not disclosure.

Revelation (n.) needs ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠every reader: each person's uniqueness reads a meaning in it that, in the whole of eternity, could not be reached without him.

Revelation (n.) as ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠the idea that Scripture contains the Word of God but is not that Word frustrates only an infantile representation of it.

Revelation (n.) passes ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠through the human: humanity in its plurality of persons is the very place of question and answer, where the prophetic becomes a lived life.

Revelation (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠modelled on ethics: a 'Thou shalt' that takes no account of 'Thou canst' — an overflowing of reason that is not insane.

Revelation (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠a solicitation of solicitation: a word that already sounds like a quotation, a dead language to be resuscitated, calling for sages to solicit the text, commentary upon commentary.

Revelation (n.) establishes ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠nothing: it connects the non-additive — a connection for which language, sociality or love is the original metaphor. Establishing produces systems; Revelation is life.

Revelation (n.) insinuates ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠its own dismissal: a God on a mountain or in a burning bush — and what if it were a storm, and the Scriptures came from dreamers? It is up to me to retain or repel this God without boldness.

Revelation (n.) blinks: ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠the alternating question mark in the said — unlike the theologians' univocal logos — is its very pivot, experienced by incessantly running up against its own contestation.

Revelation (n.) that ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠announces its origin may betray itself: perhaps truth once said must at once appear as not said, to escape the historians and sociologists who would reduce its still small voice to the din of battlefields and marketplaces.