Sovereignty (n.) does not seek to grasp concepts but to explode them.
Sovereignty (n.) resembles lordship trait for trait, yet it is the absolute alteration of every trait.
Sovereignty (n.) is the useless, senseless loss of excess energy, which can never be put to use.
Sovereignty (n.) in its archaic, authentic form seems to imply impotence: it refuses the exercise of power.
Sovereignty (n.) is lost the moment we go looking for it: seeking subordinates the present to a later moment.
Sovereignty (n.) in Bataille's sense is spent wholly in the instant, in the ways a person gives himself to himself: laughter, eroticism, struggle, luxury.
Sovereignty (n.) is not political but ontological, belongs to all men, and ceases at the appearance of usefulness since usefulness is always for another thing.
Sovereignty (n.) is NOTHING, as Bataille wore himself out trying to say — which does not mean that sovereignty is death; quite the contrary.
Sovereignty (n.) in Bataille's counterconcept lies beyond mastery and the state: it cultivates evil and sexual and poetic transgression.
Sovereignty (n.) is entirely non-utilitarian. Since usefulness is always usefulness for something, which is to say 'subject' to that thing, sovereignty ceases at the appearance of usefulness.
Sovereignty (n.) is an ecstatic departure from a strong notion of intentionality and agency reproduces personhood as a drama, just this time a drama of heterogeneity rather than subjective overorganization.