Tradition (n.) is that seemingly natural thing which has forgotten the unfamiliar source from which it arose.
Tradition (n.) remains rich in truth, so detaching ourselves from our usual notions must never be forced.
Tradition (n.) pours into our period as into no other, and no period has been so poor in genuine tradition.
Tradition (n.) is problematic when it becomes master, for when it does so, what it ‘transmits’ becomes concealed.
Tradition (n.) rules best when it releases us from mere looking back into a thinking ahead, one that is no longer planning.
Tradition (n.) is taken seriously only by those unwilling to make their own labor easier than it was for those they wish to revive.
Tradition (n.) is not shaken off by a radical redefinition but appropriated at its root.
Tradition (n.) appears to lie behind us; in fact it approaches us, since we are its prisoners and are destined for it.
Tradition (n.) offers a flight from the present that mixes humility with presumption and yields only self-deception and blindness to the historical moment.
Tradition (n.) need not be discarded as merely past: the new question can take its whole history back into a more originary ownership.
Tradition (n.) of thinking hands on not a "doctrine" or "system" but what obliges — and that opens only to those whose origin is in the abyss.
Tradition (n.) genuinely experienced is so far from being the dead weight of the past that it frees us for what approaches us as present.
Tradition (n.) pervades even the most radical attempt to begin all over again: its concepts carry inherited horizons we cannot be sure arose from the things themselves.
Tradition (n.) looks innocent and absolutely valid to those for whom it has no provenance; to them, recollective thinking about old words seems subversive.
Tradition (n.) and its values, called on to master technology, are already enlisted by it: the very attempt employs technological means and shows technology's power.
Tradition (n.) hides what it hands down once it becomes master: it delivers our inheritance over to self-evidence and makes us forget it ever had a source.
Tradition (n.) must be known most rigorously by exactly those who mean to tear down an aged world — only radical historical knowledge saves them from mere restoration and uncreative imitation.
Tradition (n.) of epistemological ideals may be only a shadowy life, hardened into a long, degenerate, spurious inheritance that no one ever made their own.
Tradition (n.) is the interpretation of ourselves we grow up into before we choose anything, and through which our possibilities are both disclosed and regulated.
Tradition (n.) takes what has come down to us and delivers it over to self-evidence; blocking our access to those primordial ‘sources’ from which the categories and concepts handed down to us have been quite genuinely drawn.