Aesthetic judgment (n.) is short-sighted but supremely persuasive: it says Yes or No before the intellect has had a chance to speak.
Aesthetic judgment (n.) is a judgment that something is beautiful, ugly or otherwise good or bad as art or appearance.
Aesthetic judgment (n.) is really just cultural evaluation.
Apophantic judgement (n.) is a judgment that asserts a predicate of a subject, and so can be true or false.
An Apophantic judgement (n.) is the sentence that claims the world is this way, period.
An Apophantic judgement (n.) is a kind of judgement that does not follow the comparative method. Rather, it works by attributing predicates to subjects.
A Conclusion (n.) can work on us like an order drawn from a shuffled deck: after all, no one gave you the order.
A Conclusion (n.) you find hard to swallow must be fought upstream: expose a false premise or a broken step, or else stop quarrelling with it.
Conclusion (n.) at its fullest is long and slow, preceded by lingering, which is why it is not violence.
A Conclusion (n.) about God brings to an end what should never end, the impact of the sky on the soul.
Condemnation (n.) one lives under turns into repudiations one performs — and grievances against the law become conflicted efforts to overcome the muted rage of one's own repudiations.
Condemnation (n.) is the grown-up alternative to repression: the wish is consciously judged and rejected instead of automatically buried.
Condemnation (n.) replaces repression in analysis: the automatic, excessive process of repression gives way to temperate, purposeful control by the highest agencies of the mind.
Condemnation (n.) hides a secret envy of those who enjoy perversions, like the Landgrave in the Tannhäuser parody: 'strange how these things don't happen to people such as us.'