multiplicity

bread

existentialism

individuality

is a zone that is not logically predetermined, but rather invents by differentiating.

Deleuze finds that the problem of continuity is better posed by Bergson, when he says that a duration is the actualization of 'qualitative' rather than a 'quantitative' multiplicity. To continue a multiplicity is to move into a zone that is not logically predetermined, but rather 'invents by differentiating.' 21 (Rajchman 2000 : 59)

is one and the same with becoming. This is because multiplicities are always crossing over one another and transforming each other.

For Deleuze, multiplicity and becoming are one in the same. This is because multiplicities are always crossing over one another and transforming each other (Deleuze and Guattari 1987). Although composed of several dimensions, . . .

, unlike a series of numbers, can't be counted. Its components can't be picked out one by one, and they retain a certain vagueness. 'Stabilizations'.

But unlike a series of numbers, what Deleuze calls a multiplicity can't be counted... its components can't be picked out one by one, and they retain a certain vagueness. They are rather like 'stabilizations' in what Gilbert Simondon called 'meta-stable systems' systems that themselves change along with the definition of their individual components. (Rajchman 2000 : 58)

is subversive. One has to multiply thoughts to the point where there aren't enough policemen to control them.

One has to multiply thoughts to the point where there aren't enough policemen to control them.

multiplicity, n.Memes

Keep exploring multiplicity→

multiplicity