intellectual

academia

dad joke

mistake

reading

Kanye West

one-liner

academic

confusion

scholar

bullshitter

bullshit

snob

Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

poser

vocabulary

coinage

jargon

thesaurus

verbosity

is a middle-class product... if he is not born into the class he must soon insert himself into it, in order to exist. He is the fine nervous flower of the bourgeoisie.

The intellectual is a middle-class product... if he is not born into the class he must soon insert himself into it, in order to exist. He is the fine nervous flower of the bourgeoisie.

is a petty bourgeoisie and nothing more than the ideologist of the dominant class.

For Marx the intellectual is nothing more than the ideologist of the dominant class and a member of the bourgeoisie and from the proletariat, but would tend to be linked to the petty bourgeoisie by virtue of its life-style.'

is an individual who seeks to to re-enchant the world within this world, which, because of modernity could no longer be regarded as a meaningful cosmos underpinning ideas of progress, coherence, justice and ethics. Secularization, knowledge and science were driving out the illusionary ideas of a meaningfully ordered cosmos.

Another new role of the contemporary intellectual was to re-enchant the world. . . . Part of Weber's irritation was his role as an intellectual. The essential message, stemming from his Protestant ethic studies, was that the world could no longer be regarded as a meaningful cosmos underpinning ideas of progress, coherence, justice and ethics. Secularization, knowledge and science were driving out the illusionary ideas of a meaningfully ordered cosmos. Modernity, in its embrace of industry and cities, was turning away from the long era in agrarian settlements of gods and spirits. Weber's message as an intellectual was not to look for meaning beyond the empirical. Weber was slightly premature here in that he failed to anticipate the era of nationalism and the role of the intellectuals as ideologist of national consciousness and nation state modernization. He was not unaware of nationalist, but they also seem to have irritated him.

is, as a revolutionary, first and foremost seen as a traitor to his class of origin.

Why' because, in the form of his culture, the bourgeois class gave him a means of production which, on the basis of the privilege of culture, makes him solidary with it, and even more so it with him. It is thus completely correct when Aragon, in another connection, declares: 'The revolutionary intellectual appears, first and foremost, as a traitor to his class of origin.' (Benjamin 'author as producer' 8)

is different from the ordinary man only in certain sections of his personality, and even then not all the time.

The intellectual is different from the ordinary man, but only in certain sections of his personality, and even then not all the time. George Orwell

is, in a society such as ours, tasked to criticize the workings of institutions that appear to be both neutral and independent, to criticize and attack them in such a manner that the political violence that has always exercised itself obscurely through them will be unmasked, so that one can fight against them.

The real political task in a society such as ours is to criticize the workings of institutions that appear to be both neutral and independent, to criticize and attack them in such a manner that the political violence that has always exercised itself obscurely through them will be unmasked, so that one can fight against them. Michel Foucault

is, in the present cultural situation, marked by the loss of community, tasked only with undermining the legitimacy of all that exist, but no longer to present a new image of integration'.

This is to say that the present cultural situation is one in which the loss of community is so advanced that the unmasking of pretended totality, the 'ideology critique' of Marxism, is all that remains for intellectuals. , Their task is to undermine the legitimacy of all that exist, but no longer to present a new image of integration' (Rabinow and Sullivan 15).

is manipulated into perpetuating totalization when he things that the pursuit of knowledge can be extricated from the articulation of power.

However, although the definition and production of knowledge are implicated in the moment of power, the problem that Foucault raises for an alternative idea of inquiry is not a problem of how to extricated the pursuit of knowledge from the articulation of power. To think that they are opposed is part of the ruse by which intellectuals are manipulated into perpetuating totalization.

intellectual, n.One-Liners

Keep exploring intellectual→

intellectual