language

is a non-innate thing. Reason preceded it and it gradually evolved through the exercise of that reason and through a dialogue generated to effect human ends.

For Man-deville, language is not innate... rather, reason precedes speech and language gradually evolves through the exercise of that reason and through a dialogue generated to effect human ends.Mandeville focuses on 'the Language of the Eyes' by which 'our wild Couplewould at their first meeting intelligibly say more to one another without guile, thenany civilz'd pair would dare to name without blushing' (287). Here, then, desire cane communicated in the pre-linguistic state with a directness that the conventional na-ture of language hides (as it is meant to, in a society that has developed manners andsocial inhibitions).Language comes into being only 'By slow degrees, as all other Arts and Sciences' (288). The original couple, th e longer they lived together, would rely less onprimary ges tures and 'for the Things they were most conversant with they would find out Sounds, to stir up in each other the Ideas of such Things, when they were out of Sight' (288). They would teach this to their young, who would improve upon it. Andeach generation then gradually extends the language

MandevilleThinkers

Mandeville