justice

liberalism

nationality

American

occupation / innovator as

philosopher

university professor

Harvard University

innovator in the field of

moral philosophy

political

scientific organization

American Academy of Arts and Sciences

pedagogue

political philosopher

scientist

professor

Phi Beta Kappa Society

is simply giving people what they deserve... however the difficulty lies in figuring out who deserves what and why.

The simplest way of understanding justice is giving people what they deserve. This idea goes back to Aristotle. The real difficulty begins with figuring out who deserves what and why. Michael Sandel

is that which to argue about is unavoidably to argue about virtues, about substantive moral and even spiritual questions.

To argue about justice is unavoidably to argue about virtues, about substantive moral and even spiritual questions. Michael Sandel

is not necessarily problematic in that it places great emphasis on individual rights... it is problematic in that we cannot easily define and justify our individual rights without taking a stand on the moral and even sometimes religious convictions that citizens bring to public life.

My main quarrel with liberalism is not that liberalism places great emphasis on individual rights I believe rights are very important and need to be respected. The issue is whether it is possible to define and justify our rights without taking a stand on the moral and even sometimes religious convictions that citizens bring to public life. Michael Sandel

Michael SandelThinkers

Michael Sandel