global

is an emergent dimension of arguing about the connection between sites in a multisited ethnography.

For ethnograpy, then, there is no global in the local-global contrast now so frequently evoked. The global is an emergent dimension of arguing about the connection among sites in a multisited ethnography' (Marcus 1995:99)

is not already out there but rather is an emergent dimension of arguing about the connection among sites.

For ethnography, then, there is no global in the local-global contrast so frequently evoked now. The global is an emergent dimension of arguing about the connection among sites in a multi-sited ethnography' (Marcus 1995).

is not something that exist in the first place, at least as it is imagined modern informational aesthetics.

A central argument of this book is that the ethnographic problem posed by globalization is not one of how to generalize from, to categorize, or to simplify phenomenological complexity but rather that the global does not exist in the first place, at least as it is imagined modern informational aesthetics (chap. 3).. In other words. I hope to demonstrate that anthropologist err where they take simulations of the artifacts of' academic analysis, such as networks or slogans, as indigenous signposts that phenomenological complexity, or social reality, stands behind them (as we understand to be ' the case of our own analysis). (Riles 2001:20).

global, n.All

global