Michael Saylor

is guilty of trying to have it both ways, making the claim that Bitcoin is going to go to the moon and subsume all the value of every US asset class and not be a threat to the US dollar.

he can't have it both ways you can't make that claim that bitcoin is going to go to the moon and subsume all the value of every us asset class and not be a threat to the us dollar and i think he's probably a bit late because now it's squarely on the radar of a lot of the makers a lot of the pundits and they're talking about the threat to the us dollar by bitcoin um and it's going to be monetary very closely uh as the asset value goes goes up in price

is opportunistically trashing gold not because he believes it to be worthless, but because he’s trying to create a narrative whereby gold’s 12 trillion dollars of value is transferred to bitcoin, thus justifying prices it will never achieve.

As far as your claims on gold i'm not really sure what you're trying to achieve by disparaging gold i mean i do have a theory and you're welcome to correct me if you think i'm wrong but i think um you're trying to create a narrative for a higher price for bitcoin and in order to do that you need to convince everyone out there that gold is worthless and all of that value that currency currently resides in gold will be all transferred all 12 trillion dollars of it will be transferred to bitcoin um and that in that way you can justify a 500 000 bitcoin price or a million dollar bitcoin price um otherwise why would anybody buddy pay sixty thousand dollars today uh without that target in mind i can't see any other way where you can make the kind of claims that you're making about where the price where bitcoin is going

is basically doing what many of our wives won’t let us do, but at a much larger scale.

Michael Saylor, n.Definitions

Michael Saylor