atrocity

is always reconciled to people by custom. Fashion is such that it drives them to acquire any custom.

Custom will reconcile people to any atrocity, and fashion will drive them to acquire any custom. George Bernard Shaw

is never a rectification of the past. It merely arms the future for more atrocity.

Atrocity never balances or rectifies the past. Atrocity merely arms the future for more atrocity. Frank Herbert

is apt to change its moral color when committed by 'our' side.

Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them. There is almost no kind of outrage-torture, imprisonment without trial, assassination, the bombing of civilians-which does not change its moral color when it is committed by 'our' side. The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them. George Orwell

is a concept unique to humanity. Man is the only animal that deals in war, that atrocity of atrocities.

Man is the only animal that deals in that atrocity of atrocities, War. He is the only one that gathers his brethren about him and goes forth in cold blood and calm pulse to exterminate his kind. Mark Twain

is something people become accustomed to by tradition.

Tradition will accustom people to any atrocity. George Bernard Shaw

is tied to religion --- people will cease to commit atrocities only when they cease to believe absurdities.

Role will cease to commit atrocities only when they cease to believe absurdities.

is arrived at via a road paved by ideology.

Ideology always paves the way toward atrocity.

ideology

cause

is never the lesson we think it is --- No massacre protects against the next one.

No massacre protects against the next one.

atrocity, n.Definitions

atrocity