covering up

color

concealment

covering

etymology

concealing

is the counterconcept to phenomenology. It is able to take the form of burying in the sense that a phenomenon can lapse back into obscurity.

2/ BuryingIn the sense that a phenomenon can be buried over, i.e., it has been discovered once, but has now lapsed back into obscurity. However, in this case, the burial is hardly ever total. Something may still be visible if only as a semblance (but nevertheless it is a semblance of the entity's Being).(Munday 'heidegger' )

is the counterconcept to phenomenology. It is able to take the form of disguise in the sense that a phenomenon can be disguised as something else.

3/ DisguiseIn the sense that a phenomenon can be disguised as something else, with the attendant possibilities of lies and deception which makes the discovery of the true being of that phenomenon especially difficult.Furthermore covering up, whether in terms of hiddenness, burying or disguise has two additional possibilities:i/ Covering up which is accidentalii/ Covering up which with the best of intentions gets 'lost in translation' when immediate experience is represented in language. : In the latter case, the Being of the entity gets understood in an empty way because its ownmost Being gets lost. [ref. 7, page 60 61] (Munday 'heidegger' )

is the counterconcept to phenomenology. It is able to take the form of hiddenness in the sense that a phenomenon has not been discovered.

1/ HiddennessIn the sense that a phenomenon has not been discovered (in which case it is neither known nor unknown). (Munday 'heidegger' )

is the counter-concept to phenomenology (insofar as phenomenology is a revealing activity). A phenomenon can be covered up via hiddenness, burying, and disguise, and can be either accidental or a result of mistranslation.

Covering up is the counter-concept to phenomenology. There are many senses in which a phenomenon can be covered up. (Munday 'heidegger' ): 1/ HiddennessIn the sense that a phenomenon has not been discovered (in which case it is neither known nor unknown). (Munday 'heidegger' ). (2) Burying: In the sense that a phenomenon can be buried over, i.e., it has been discovered once, but has now lapsed back into obscurity. However, in this case, the burial is hardly ever total. Something may still be visible if only as a semblance (but nevertheless it is a semblance of the entity's Being).(Munday 'heidegger' (3) Disguise: In the sense that a phenomenon can be disguised as something else, with the attendant possibilities of lies and deception which makes the discovery of the true being of that phenomenon especially difficult.Furthermore covering up, whether in terms of hiddenness, burying or disguise has two additional possibilities:i/ Covering up which is accidentalii/ Covering up which with the best of intentions gets 'lost in translation' when immediate experience is represented in language. : In the latter case, the Being of the entity gets understood in an empty way because its ownmost Being gets lost. [ref. 7, page 60 61] (Munday 'heidegger' )

is the counter-concept to phenomenology. There are many senses in which a phenomenon can be covered up, be that through burying, disguise, hiddenness, getting lost in translation.

Covering up is the counter-concept to phenomenology. There are many senses in which a phenomenon can be covered up. (Munday 'heidegger' )

covering up, n.Definitions

covering up