The Ego (n.) is in a relationship with the id resembling that between a rider and his horse. The horse provides the locomotor energy, and the rider has the prerogative of determining the goal and of guiding the movements of his powerful mount towards it. But all too often in the relations between the ego and the id we find a picture of the less ideal situation in which the rider is obliged to guide his horse in the direction in which it itself wants to go.
The Ego (n.) is not master in its own house.
The Ego (n.) is not simply a defensive product of the self-preservative reality principle, but is rather a structured sedimentation of lost objects... such lost loves are, in turn, incorporated into the tissue of subjectivity itself.
The Ego (n.) is representative of what we call reason and sanity, in contrast to the id which contains the passions.
The Ego (n.) originally includes everything and later detaches from itself the external world. The ego-feeling we are aware of now is thus only a shrunken vestige of a far more extensive feeling a feeling which embraced the universe and expressed an inseparable connection of the ego with the external world.
The Ego's (n.) constitution is tied to mourning, melancholia, and grief.
The Ego (n.) is that part of the id which has been modified by the direct influence of the external world.
Ego (n.) is the organized part of the mind that attempts to integrate the drives of the id with external reality.
The Ego (n.) is the representative of the outer world to the id.