Need A Witness

Violate Expectations

miracle

Jesus Christ

tapas

fancy restaurant

one-liner

Spanish cuisine

wine

water

toilet

Facebook

camera

spectator

eyewitness

televangelist

blindness

dirty mind

is not a thing God needed to produce to convince atheists. His ordinary works ought to be convincing enough.

God never wrought miracles to convince atheism, because his ordinary works convince it. Francis Bacon

is a thing which man cannot live without. Thus, if he does not experience them, he will provide himself with miracles of his own making. He will believe in witchcraft and sorcery, even though he may otherwise be a heretic, an atheist, and a rebel.

Since man cannot live without miracles, he will provide himself with miracles of his own making. He will believe in witchcraft and sorcery, even though he may otherwise be a heretic, an atheist, and a rebel. Fyodor Dostoevsky

is, (as a simply incredible or impossible event) not an event at all but a symbol.

A miracle in the sense of a simply incredible or impossible event is, doubtless, not an event at all but a symbol.

is a present potential, not a past actual.

The miraculous element in the Gospels can't be assimilated to history or it becomes accusation: once we could have and see miracles, but now, you poor jerks, etc. There never were any miracles, but there can be miracles: miracles represent present potentials, not past actuals.

is a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see.

Miracles are a retelling in small letters of the very same story which is written across the whole world in letters too large for some of us to see.

A miracle is an event which creates faith. That is the purpose and nature of miracles. Frauds deceive. An event which creates faith does not deceive: therefore it is not a fraud, but a miracle. George Bernard Shaw

is an exception to the laws of nature, thus he who announces that such-and-such an act is miraculous declares that he knows all the laws of nature, and that he knows that this act is an exception to them. But where is this mortal who knows all the laws of nature.

Since a miracle is an exception to the laws of nature, in order to judge it one would have to know these laws . . . . Thus he who announces that such-and-such an act is miraculous declares that he knows all the laws of nature, and that he knows that this act is an exception to them. But where is this mortal who knows all the laws of nature' Newton did not pride himself on knowing them . . . . All that one can say of him who prides himself on performing miracles, is that he does quite extraordinary things: but who is denying that quite extraordinary things happen' I have seen some of these things myself, and I have even done some of them. 30

is an imaginative effort which meets with an imaginative response.

an imaginative effort which meets with an imaginative response.

miracle, n.Definitions

miracle