one sidedness, n.Definitions

One-sidedness (n.) overloads ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠one side, and that is not growth — the other side only sinks deeper.

One-sidedness (n.) sets ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠itself up beside the whole as something fixed, but in fact it does not subsist on its own; it is contained in the whole as sublated.

One-sidedness (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠what endorsing the pure principle makes of you — and the serpent lurks behind every pure principle; the hero, striving for its utmost, finally falls to the serpent.

One-sidedness (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠the necessary path of reason: philosophers must first see only one side of their task — premature satisfaction takes its revenge later in contradictions.

One-sidedness (n.) lets ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠whoever holds to divine law see on the other side only the violence of human caprice, and whoever holds to human law see only the self-will of the individual who insists on being his own authority.

One-sidedness (n.) and ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠even the deficiencies of the specialized worker, such as an abnormal development of some muscles or a curvature of bones, become perfections once he is part of the collective worker.

One-sidedness (n.) leaves ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠the one surfeited and the other starving: the satiated grows lazy, the hungry weak — and so we suffocate in fat, consumed by lack.