Sovereign power is concerned with obedience to the law of the king or central authority figure.
Sovereign power is founded in a fundamental biopolitical fracture, a distinction between zoe and bios, between people and the people.
Sovereign power is power which relies on the ability to decide on whether certain forms of life are worthy of living.
Sovereign power is a form of power concerned with the state's power over territory (or land), whereas disciplinary power is concerned primarily with the body, namely, with breaking a multiplicity of men into individual bodies. Biopolitics, then, is addressed to a multiplicity of men (or population).
Sovereign power is not so much about re-establishing balance to bring into play, at its most extreme point, the dissymmetry between the subject who has dared to violate the law and the all-powerful sovereign who displays his strength.
Sovereign power is concerned with the state's absolute power over its territory. It was 'exercised over land and the produce of the land, much more so than over bodies and what they do.
Sovereign power is power which is possessed and then wielded repressively by one individual over another or others, which became ineffective in the face of increasingly com plex social, political and economic relations that developed in the latter part of the sixteenth and early part of the seventeenth centuries.