Speech (n.) relieves us by translating us into the general, and so robs me of my singularity, my liberty, my responsibility.
Speech (n.) feels like self-presence because its sound seems to hold no difference, so the voice passes for thought.
Speech (n.) can be genuine without knowledge: the object that animates its signifier need not be known to speaker or hearer through intuition.
Speech (n.) is emancipated as nonknowing in Husserl, who describes that emancipation and effaces it in one movement.
Speech (n.) draws from a stock of writing, noted or not, that language is; its complicity with writing is revealed by the reduction of the phone.
Speech (n.) is originarily passive, relating to a past that no reactivation of the origin can fully master.
Speech (n.) is a continuous stream that linguistic analysis resolves into discrete units, so that form in language is granular.
Speech (n.) always presents itself as the best expression of liberty, a language that need not borrow its signifiers from the world and so seems incapable of being dispossessed.
Speech (n.) excites attention that the visible has to demand: the ear is always open and offered to provocation.
Speech (n.) never gives the thing itself; it gives a simulacrum that touches us more deeply than the truth.
Speech (n.) arrived like a catastrophe, an unpredictable misfortune; nothing made it necessary.
Speech (n.) makes the child cry less: one language supplants another, and once Emile can say "It hurts me," it takes a very sharp pain to make him cry.
Speech (n.) is not innate: by the nature of things alone, men first lived in woods and caves, uttering confused sounds until association made them articulate.
Speech (n.) is realized without defect only in God, as the presence and origin of writing.
Speech (n.) never belongs to the one who speaks: the words I have found are repeated before they are mine.
Speech (n.) is stolen from language, and so stolen from itself, from a thief who has always already lost it as property.
Speech (n.) need not be suppressed; it has only to take on the importance words have in dreams.
Speech (n.) figures in dreams much as captions do in comic strips, its phonetic text secondary to the picture.
Speech (n.) and writing will once more become gestures.
Speech (n.) carries the inside outside without abandoning it there, unlike writing, and so confers existence on the concept.