Violence (n.) is a tool which may bring about about momentary results, but both impractical and immoral as a way of achieving racial justice.
Violence (n.) denies human integrity, and leads to hopelessness and helplessness.
Violence (n.) is, as a way of achieving racial justice, both impractical and immoral. It is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all.
Violence (n.) is both an impractical and immoral way to achieve social justice... it is impractical because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding... it seeks to annihilate rather than to convert. Violence is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love.
Violence (n.) is immoral because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for everybody.
Violence (n.) is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding, to annihilate rather than to convert.
Violence (n.) is immoral because it thrives on hatred rather than love. It destroys community and makes brotherhood impossible. It leaves society in monologue rather than dialogue. Violence ends by defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers.
Violence (n.) is impractical, because the old eye for an eye philosophy ends up leaving everybody blind.
Violence (n.) is merely the adding of deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars.
Violence (n.) is never a justified means because the means represent the ideal in the making... as such, destructive means, in the long run of history, cannot bring about constructive ends.
Violence (n.) is not only impractical but immoral.
Violence (n.) ends up defeating itself. It creates bitterness in the survivors and brutality in the destroyers.
Violence (n.) never really deals with the basic evil of the situation by establishing truth in its place... it may murder the murderer, but it doesn't murder murder.
Violence (n.) is such that the question is no longer between violence and non-violence it is between non-violence and non-existence.
Violence (n.) is such that violence on television, by allowing our movie and television screens to teach our children that the hero is one who masters the art of shooting and the technique of killing we have created an atmosphere in which violence and hatred have become popular pastimes.