Become Real Only When Shared

Become Real Through Recognition

Exist Mostly In The Mind

Exist To Be Found

Have No Bottom

Need Interpretation To Exist

Only Mean Something To One Person

Resist Being Counted

Resist Compression

Resist Ownership

meaning

Jordan Peterson

ontology

sense

Gottlob Frege

interpretation

meaninglessness

significance

vagueness

is finally banished in Japan. Japan thus becomes a test and a challenge to think the unthinkable.

For Barthes Japan is a test, a challenge to think the unthinkable, a place where meaning is finally banished. Paradise, indeed, for the great student of signs.' Edmund White, The New York Times Book Review

Japan

semiotics

Japanese culture

is a cognitive structure oriented to the past. It is differentiated from 'value' which is a affective structure of the present moment and 'ends' which are structures of an emerging, goal-directed future. Meaning, as mediated through memory, is key to the structuring of experience in that it provides the reflexive articulation of what would otherwise be the affectively infused experience of mere temporal succession through value.

According to Turner's reading of Dilthey, where 'meaning' is essentially a cognitive structure oriented to the past, 'value' is an affective structure tied to the vicissitudes of the present moment, while 'ends' are volitional structures tied to goal-directed behavior oriented toward an emerging future. As Turner argues, while 'ends' do play a role in structuring experience, it is primarily the cognitive category of 'meaning' as mediated through memory that provides the reflexive articulation of what would otherwise be the affectively infused experience of mere temporal succession through value. Where meaning is tied to memory, cognition and coherence, the category of 'value' is tied to those affective structures of experience that are immersed in the present arising moment. (throop 2003: 223)

is a function of what audience response a typical speaker would intend to elicit in uttering it.

Grice's hypothesis that a sentence's or word's meaning is a function of what audience response a typical speaker would intend to elicit in uttering it...

is a matter of expression: Acts 'signify,' have 'import' and, through them, things are 'getting said'.

For Geertz, meaning is a matter of expression: acts 'signify,' have 'import' and, through them, things are 'getting said.' But cultural interpretation is not a matter of grasping the significations and imports. Instead it is a theoretical construction one step removed from interpretation within the culture. And that underscores the (scientifically) constructed nature of these theoretical entities is the fact that in the 'real' world cultural systems (of meaning) and social systems (of causal interaction) don't exist as distinct complexes. Rather, they are theoretical constructions out of reality. Following Sorokin, Geertz argues that:

is a particular flavor perceived by a consciousness when it tastes a combination of elements of which any one taken alone would not produce a comparable flavor.

( What do I understand by meaning' A particular flavour perceived by a consciousness when it tastes a combination of elements of which any one taken alone would not produce a comparable flavour. So, just as a laboratory worker trying to make a chemical compound has many means at his disposal to test his result he has his spectrograph, and his reagents, but he is not usually content with these for he also knows that he has a tongue, so he tastes, recognizes the characteristic flavour and says: yes, that's it the ethnologist also tries to recover the meaning and complement his objective proofs by intuition. He is a being endowed with sensitivity and intelligence, he has these means as well. So he tries to reconstitute the meaning... he reconstitutes it by mechanical means, he constructs it, unwraps it. And then, after all, he is a man, so he tastes it. (C.L.S 'confrontation': 67)

is a synonym for power, and a concept only has meaning if it has power (or, affect).

For Nietzsche, meaning is a synonym for power, and a concept only has meaning if it has power (or, affect).

is always an effect, a by-product, an event whereby, as in all events, the subject is precisely what is missing.

for Deleuze, meaning is always an 'effect', an effect-product for which the rules of production must be discovered (Vuarnet and Deleuze 1968). Meaning is not directly (and literally) represented but, instead, comes to be as a by-product. . . . Thus, if they are truly effects of theseprocesses, these strategies for producing meaning, and in as much as they arethe product of discursive actions, it cannot be forgotten that they have thenature of an event, in that they are really meaningful events, and the subject isprecisely what is missing in the event (Deleuze 1990). [Giuseppe Gangemi and Francesca Gelli. Metaphors and Politics. An inquiry into the Political Discourse of the Italian Second Republic p.10

is always connected to an act: The act of intentional experience.

Husserl meaning is always and primarily meaning of an act i.e., of an intentional experience.

meaning, n.All

meaning