Essence (n.) is not an end, but a means, a means requiring the field of 'ideality' in order to know and to conquer its facticity.
An Essence (n.) is not an end, but a means. Our existence is too tightly held in the world in order to know itself as such -it needs the field of 'ideality' in order to know and to conquer its facticity.
Essence (n.) is not separate from existence. It is the function of language to make essences exist in a state of separation which is only apparent.
Essence (n.) must bring back with it all the living relationships of experience, as the fisherman's net draws up from the depths of the ocean quivering fish and seaweed.
Essence (n.) lies beneath things, not above them: varying a thing in imagination never yields a pure form floating free of the world, only the joints and armature of the visible, still bound to the ground it came from.