Logic (n.) is, as compared with induction, a flawed and unfirm grounding for the sciences insofar as it consist ultimately in words which are symbols of notions which might be confused.
Logic (n.) is different from rhetoric as the fist is different from the palm... the one is a closing, the other is an opening up.
Logic (n.) is, in the aristotelian sense, contentious and well nigh useless.
Logic (n.) is less significant than chance in the invention of arts and sciences.
Logic (n.) is problematic because the subtlety of nature is greater many times over than the subtlety of argument.
Logic (n.) serves to harmfully fix and give stability to the errors which have their foundation in commonly received notions than to help the search for truth.