Nature (n.) is a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of license, that is to say, it is a state of pure and perfect freedom, and does not imply a state of perpetual war.
Nature (n.) is a term that is constantly in flux: Humans have no naturally existing definition, no natural characteristics, but they have natural activities and thus make nature part of themselves.
Nature (n.) is an intellectual construction in which moral agents seek property and security against others, all the while endowed with prohibitions not to kill, rob, or deny basic freedoms to others.
Nature (n.) is characterized by peace, good will, mutual assistance, and preservation, in which all valuable human attributes are already possessed by the free, sovereign individual.
Nature (n.) is dreadful, but through the evocation of divine law, it is represented to man in acceptable form and thus sanitized.
Nature (n.) is inconvenient and somewhat irregular, not savage and terrifying.
Nature (n.) is inherently insufficient... human activity, which domesticates nature to our purposes and creates property, perfects nature.
Nature (n.) is man's enemy. Man is in the 'state of nature' when his great inconveniences can only be remedied by an assertion of will.
Nature (n.) is something to be appropriated, enclosed, and possessed (we might say that locke transforms hobbes's 'war of each against all' into a 'war of all against nature'.
Nature (n.) is the problem, human activity in opposition to nature is the solution.
Nature (n.) is thoroughly valueless. Human, transforming labor is the source of all value... we must produce our existence. Nature does not bestow well-being, or even survival, as a birthright. We must carve out a human arena with our labor.
Nature (n.) is virtually worthless. If unaltered nature is worthless.