Becoming (n.) is a process of change, flight, or movement within an assemblage'.
A Becoming (n.) produces nothing but itself, which is to say nonhierarchical alliances, symbiotic attachments, and the mingling of creative agents.
Becoming (n.) produces nothing but itself. Through imitation, the human being does not really 'become' an animal any more than the animal 'really' becomes something else.
Becoming (n.) is concerned with influences rather than resemblances.
Becoming (n.) is not a process of imitation or analogy, it is generative of a new way of being that is a function of influences rather than resemblances. The process is one of removing the element from its original functions and bringing about new ones.
A Becoming (n.) is not a subjective reverie, but an endowing of one's elements into a scene.
Becoming (n.) is not about imitation or assimilation. It is a double capture, a kind of non-parallel evolution, a marriage between two completely separate reigns.
Becoming (n.) is not an evolution, at least not an evolution by descent and filiation: Becoming is always of a different order than filiation : It concerns alliance. -bringing into play a totality of different scales and kingdoms, with no possible filiation.
Becoming (n.) is not an evolution, it concerns alliance, bringing into play a totality of different scales and kingdoms, with no possible filiation.
Becoming (n.) lies outside the scope of history. For example, may 1968, was not just a set of events which are actualized in particular circumstances. Rather it was a moment of grace, a becoming in its pure state.
Becoming's (n.) characteristic is to elude the present. . . Becoming does not tolerate the separation or the distinction of before and after, or of past and future. It pertains to the essence of becoming to move and pull in both directions at once.