Criticism (n.) is a phoenix preoccupied with constructing its own funeral pyre, without any guarantee that a bigger and better phoenix will manifest itself as a result.
Criticism (n.) is a spirit of practical communism whereby those who cannot write read the works of those who can and write an additional book about them.
Criticism (n.) is a structure of knowledge about literature.
Criticism (n.) is able to compare them in some degree with the infinite vision of possibilities presented by culture.
Criticism (n.) is an examination of literature in terms of a conceptual framework derivable from an inductive survey of the literary field.
Criticism (n.) is essentially one of establishing a context for the works of literature being studied.
Criticism (n.) is not a parasitic growth on literature but a special form of literary language.
Criticism (n.) is not judicial. one ought never to try to judge authors, only to understand them.
Criticism (n.) is not well enough organized as yet to know what the factors of value in a critical judgment are.
Criticism (n.) is a field in which all change takes the form of a recovery of some neglected aspect of tradition.
Criticism (n.) is a thing which, in order to point beyond itself, needs to be actively iconoclastic about itself.
Criticism (n.) can talk, and all the arts are dumb.
Criticism (n.) has nothing to do with rejection, only with recognition.
Criticism (n.) is anarchic at its most personal — as it becomes more subjective, it tends to come nearer to aesthetic anarchy.
Criticism (n.) is surely no reason why criticism, as a systematic and organized study, should not be, at least partly, a science.
Criticism (n.) is the activity of the critic that has to be outgrown before genuine criticism starts.
Criticism (n.) is the conscious organizing of a cultural tradition.
Criticism (n.) is the last judgment of mankind.