Bracketing (n.) changes nothing in my conviction and yet changes everything: the thesis stays what it is, but I make "no use" of it — it remains there like the bracketed in the bracket, the disconnected outside the connexional system.
Bracketing (n.) is not the ignorant man's failure to use a thesis, nor a turn to the negative, the presumptive or the doubtful — it is a unique transvaluing that lies wholly in our freedom.
Bracketing (n.) is not supposing that nymphs are dancing in a ring: in mere supposal no living conviction is disconnected, while bracketing disconnects a conviction that goes on living.
Bracketing (n.) is a change of indicator, not an erasure: the bracketed is not wiped off the phenomenological slate but carries its sign with it back into the inquiry — so there is still a phenomenology of nature, of man, of society.
Bracketing (n.) works an inverting change of signature: "tree," "blossoming," "plant" sound exactly as before, yet in inverted commas the words have undergone a radical modification of meaning.
Bracketing (n.) does not cast our beliefs away: they remain there as part of the phenomenon — only, instead of working with them, we make them into objects.