The Noema (n.) is a structure that is associated with each act, corresponding to all the anticipations... anticipations which are tacitly taken over from our culture and never thought about and which never exhaust the object.
Noema (n.) is an intentional objects of thought while noesis are acts of thought.
Noema (n.) is variously interpreted as either the intentional object as it is intended or the ideal content of the intentional act.
A Noema (n.) is the perceived as such, the remembered as such, the judged as such, the pleasing as such — the "meaning" that lies immanent in every act exactly as it is meant there.
A Noema (n.) is separated from all nature, physics and psychology by veritable abysses — and even that image, being naturalistic, is not strong enough for the difference.
A Noema (n.) of the same blossoming tree differs as I perceive it, remember it, imagine it or see it pictured: described in identical words, it is characterized once as bodily reality, once as fiction, once as recollection.
A Noema (n.) with its "tree" in inverted commas is no more contained in the perception as a real part than the tree of nature is; it belongs to the perception's essence in a wholly different way.
A Noema (n.) has its esse exclusively in its percipi — but in a sense as far as can be from Berkeley's, since the percipi does not contain the esse as a real part.
A Noema (n.) is what much so-called act-analysis was really describing: looking at "the meant as such," psychologists described noematic structures while believing they analysed acts.
A Noema (n.) is what every thought means, ethics included, and it presupposes the possibility of noema in general.
The Noema (n.) is neither in the world nor in consciousness, yet it is the condition of any experience.