Animal (n.) are owed gentle usage by humanity but nothing by justice, because they can never make us feel their resentment.
Animal (n.) show kindness without any suspicion of artifice; if we grant disinterested benevolence to the inferior species, by what analogy can we refuse it to the superior?
An Animal (n.) without curiosity or foresight reaches its utmost perfection in a short time and can never advance a single step beyond it.
Animal (n.) are endowed with thought and reason as well as men — a truth so evident that next to the ridicule of denying it is that of taking pains to defend it.
Animal (n.) are the touchstone of any theory of mind: an explanation that demands more subtlety than a beast, a child or a peasant possesses is proved false by that very subtlety.
Animal (n.) are the invincible proof that inference rests on custom: beasts certainly never perceive any real connexion among objects, yet they infer.
Animal (n.) have pride but can found it only on the body: they lose sight of blood ties and are incapable of right and property.
An Animal (n.) reasons from experience as we do: the old greyhound leaves the tiring part of the chase to the young and positions himself to meet the hare in her doubles.
An Animal (n.) feels, thinks, loves, hates, wills and even reasons, more imperfectly than man — so are its soul too immaterial and immortal?