Recognition (n.) at the limit of representability becomes a gesture of humility before what is not fully knowable.
Recognition (n.) at the door: friends who answer 'It's me' — and we recognize that 'it is him' or 'her.'
Recognition (n.) is a cultivated form of desire: no longer consuming the other, but seeking oneself there and finding instead the sign of one's own self-loss.
Recognition (n.) if full would establish the Other as a version of oneself; ethics must safeguard what is unmasterable in the Other.
Recognition (n.) is at once the recognition of each other as black and an erotic absorption into each other's eyes between Irene and Clare in the café.
Recognition (n.) is not conferred on a subject but forms that subject — and since no one ever fully inhabits the name that inaugurates them, subject-formation stays incomplete.
Recognition (n.) becomes not finding oneself in the Other but precisely not finding oneself there — the preservation of a difference recognition cannot overcome.
Recognition (n.) can never be fully had, yet to be a subject at all you must first comply with the norms that govern it — non-compliance puts the viability of your life in question.
Recognition (n.) leads to 'monstrous doubling' and 'narcissistic horror' when expected in full from a political term — a litany of complaint when the term fails to reflect us.
Recognition (n.) does not wait for a self to recognize: the address creates the being it then recognizes — and, by the same stroke, those it casts outside into abjection.
Recognition (n.) between sister and brother is possible, says Hegel, only because there is no desire between them; if there were desire, there could be no recognition.