485 definitions
The book's index
Necessary Illusions
346 concepts · 485 definitions
- 1960s1
- advertising1
- agenda setting1
- aggression1
- agitprop1
- ambiguity1
- amnesty2
- anti-communism1
- antisemitism2
- apathy1
- apologetics1
- atrocity2
- attack2
- attrition1
- authority1
- balance4
- belief1
- benevolence2
- benign bloodbath1
- blunder1
- border1
- capital flight1
- capitalist democracy1
- capitulation1
- cartoonist1
- casuistry1
- censorship5
- chairman of the board1
- civil libertarian1
- civil liberties3
- civilian rule1
- clandestine war1
- clarity1
- class-consciousness1
- cliche1
- client state1
- coalition1
- Cold War3
- communist1
- complicity1
- concision1
- conformity2
- conscience1
- conservatism1
- conspiracy theory1
- constitution1
- constructive bloodbath1
- contempt1
- Correction1
- cost-benefit analysis1
- covert operations1
- creeping socialism1
- crisis of democracy3
- culture of narcissism1
Democracy (n.) is narrowly conceived in American political culture: the citizen is a consumer — an observer, not a participant, allowed to ratify policies made elsewhere.
Democracy (n.) is most safely neutralized not by abolishing it but by hollowing it out — the forms left standing, the substance quietly removed.
Democracy (n.) is praised as the engine of growth in the Asian tigers, where it turns out to mean rejecting democratic forms for cheap labor and state-corporate control — closer to traditional fascism.
Democracy (n.) is achieved abroad when local oligarchs, business, a friendly military and obedient professionals hold power — and restored by force whenever the people object.
Freedom of the press (n.) can coexist with near-total conformity: eighty-five opinion columns split on aid to the rebels, and all eighty-five condemn the government they fight.
Freedom of the press (n.) has so few true believers among articulate intellectuals that they could fit in a living room — most cry out only when the enemy is the censor.
Freedom of the press (n.) is, in American usage, so fused with private ownership that a call to let citizens take part in the media sounds like an attack on it.
Freedom of the press (n.) is tested less by any one columnist's honesty than by the range of views permitted: does the boundary of dissent sit where the state would put it?
The Media (n.) are corporations selling a product to buyers — and the product is you, the audience, sold to advertisers.
The Media (n.) are not a threat to the established order but its watchmen, guarding privilege against the danger of public understanding.
Media (n.) would still have to show a world tolerably close to reality even if their only job were serving the powerful — investors and state managers cannot act on fantasies.
Media (n.) will always come out superbly if judged only by the media: what they produce turns out to match exactly what they produce.
Propaganda (n.) runs on a one-line syllogism: the claim is needed, therefore it is true.
Propaganda (n.) is hardest to escape when the two great rival systems agree.
Propaganda (n.) is not refuted by dissidents: Pravda serves the state whether or not a single Soviet reader believes a word of it.
Propaganda (n.) that works well is hard to escape precisely because it allows lively debate — it bars only the dissent and the facts it does not want.
Censorship (n.) was dropped in England in 1695 not on libertarian principle but because it was no longer needed: the opinion-formers now censored themselves.
Censorship (n.) is unnecessary where you must be rich to own a newspaper and right-wing to survive owning one: poverty and deadly fear do the work.
Censorship (n.) is unnecessary where murdering dozens of journalists suffices.
Censorship (n.) let wartime America circulate the official portrait of Lenin, but not Lenin himself.
The Propaganda model (n.) predicts its own exclusion: if it is wrong it will be dismissed, and if it is right it will be dismissed.
Propaganda model (n.) predicts its own exclusion: if the media serve power, a theory saying so must be kept out of the debate about the media.
Propaganda model (n.) predicts on three levels: how the media behave, how that behavior is debated, and how studies exposing it will be ignored or bitterly condemned.
The Propaganda model (n.) holds that the media serve interlinked state and corporate power, framing the news to suit privilege and fencing debate accordingly.
Terrorism (n.) is terrorism only when official enemies commit it; when we or our clients do the same, it is the defense of democracy and human rights.
Terrorism (n.) admits three honest stances — blame the official enemy, dismiss the topic, or study it and let the chips fall — and only the last is unthinkable, because it leads home.
Terrorism (n.) rose and fell in the news with almost nothing happening in the world — rising when the public had to be mobilized behind state violence, subsiding when the bills came due.
Terrorism (n.) made an ideal enemy for the 1980s: weak enough to be attacked with impunity, menacing enough to rally the public behind state power at home and violence abroad.
Necessary illusion (n.) is Reinhold Niebuhr's name for the faith that keeps the ordinary person moving; rationality belongs to the cool observers who supply it.
A Necessary illusion (n.) survives being false in every particular: once it is established, the other side can be punished for breaking pledges it never made.
Necessary illusion (n.) lay the groundwork for violence: before force can be used, the public must be conditioned by propaganda to believe in the menace it is meant to meet.
Necessary illusion (n.) are what prevail once the inconvenient facts have become of interest only to archivists.
Self-defense (n.) stretches wide enough, once an alternative social model counts as intervention, to make aggression into defense with ease.
Self-defense (n.) by people a friendly regime is slaughtering counts as a crime for hawks and doves alike; arming the victims of an enemy regime would have been a sign of true nobility.
Self-defense (n.) against the United States is, by the tacit premise of responsible debate, a right no state possesses.
Self-defense (n.) is, in diplomatic usage, a sacred and broadly read right of the great power and its clients — and never of their victims.
Balance (n.) is proved, for the media, by being attacked from both sides — no one need check whether either attack is true.
Balance (n.) is offered by the media that succeed — both sides presented, provided both stay inside the narrow consensus of the powerful.
Balance (n.) can mean, in a wartime editorial, blaming the besieged city and the army shelling it in equal measure.
Balance (n.) can be a boilerplate line in news reporting, kicking in at odd intervals past the story's halfway mark, as if by software.