486 definitions
The book's index
Hegemony or Survival
373 concepts · 486 definitions
- 1960s1
- 9/112
- Abstention1
- activism1
- Afghan trap1
- aggression2
- air power1
- Allies1
- ally1
- altruism1
- American power1
- anti-Americanism3
- anticipatory self-defense1
- antifascist resistance1
- apologetics1
- appeasement1
- armageddon1
- arms race2
- authority1
- axis of evil1
- balance of terror1
- bewildered herd1
- blowback2
- bulldozer1
- burden of proof1
- capital controls1
- chronology1
- citizenship1
- civilization1
- client state2
- coalition1
- coercion2
- Cold War2
- colonization2
- communism1
- compensation2
- complicity1
- conformism1
- conquest1
- conscience1
- consequences1
- consultation1
- contagion1
- conversion1
- cost-benefit analysis1
- counterterror1
- counterterrorism1
- covert operations1
- credibility2
- crime2
- crisis1
- crisis of democracy1
- Cuban Missile crisis1
- culture of terror1
- cynicism1
Democracy (n.) is now largely the right to choose among commodities — what remains of it.
Democracy (n.) is fine, as Baghdadis understood Washington, but only if you do what we say.
Democracy (n.) meant, as Washington defined it before the Iraq war, following its orders against the will of your own population — Old Europe was condemned for listening to its people.
Democracy (n.) can be a liability for a small country on the Security Council: once it has a public to answer to, voting as that public wishes may bring economic strangulation.
Terrorism (n.) is whatever our leaders declare it to be, by the convenient definition in force. Period.
Terrorism (n.) is said to be impossible to define, though official definitions are clear enough; the trouble is that they describe our own counterterror too.
Terrorism (n.) is "a war against ordinary citizens," Shultz said, while US planes bombed Libya — the first terror attack timed for prime-time news.
Terrorism (n.) can win the quiet sympathy of those who detest it: wealthy secular Arabs called bin Laden "the conscience of Islam" because at least he reacted to US policies.
Sanctions (n.) on Iraq may have killed more people than all weapons of mass destruction in history, by two hawkish analysts' reckoning.
Sanctions (n.) on Iraq punished the tyrant's crimes by crushing his victims — as if, when a hijacker seizes a school bus, we blew it up and rewarded the hijacker.
Sanctions (n.) bind a people more tightly to their tyrant, since they come to depend on him for survival.
Sanctions (n.) on Iraq killed hundreds of thousands, strengthened the tyrant, and made his people depend on him to survive.
Self-defense (n.) applied universally would entitle Cuba and Nicaragua to bomb Miami — which is why the question is never even raised.
Self-defense (n.) can mean, in the doctrinal system, invading a country because its revolution challenged the survival of capitalism everywhere — attack, therefore, is defense.
Self-defense (n.) by a small target is what the planners fear most, since a request for arms lets them paint the victim as a threat — the script that worked in Guatemala.
Self-defense (n.) "against future attack" was Reagan's reading of the UN Charter for bombing Libya — perhaps the first explicit doctrine of preventive war.
Wilsonian idealism (n.) in its modern form holds that America is history's vanguard and so must dominate forever — making its freedom to use force a gift to mankind.
Wilsonian idealism (n.) rests on one unspoken premise: we are good, even noble, so our interventions are righteous in intent if sometimes clumsy in execution.
Wilsonian idealism (n.) holds, in its real-world version, that America stands for something the world needs and will take, whether it likes it or not.
Wilsonian idealism (n.) holds that government belongs in the hands of "the good, though but a few" — the very words of seventeenth-century English gentry frightened of the multitude.
History (n.) is written by power with confidence it will go unchallenged, so a diplomatic catastrophe can enter the books as a grand triumph.
History (n.) is full of precedents for what we watch every day; only the stakes rise, along with the means of destruction.
History (n.) now runs on two tracks — one toward hegemony, one toward the belief that another world is possible — and the stakes have never been higher.
History (n.) does not lose its atrocities just because its caretakers would prefer it to.
Propaganda (n.) was born in the freest societies, which is only natural: where the lash is unavailable, the mind must be steered instead.
Propaganda (n.) is rarely entirely false, even at its most egregious; its craft lies in the selection.
Propaganda (n.) outlives the war it sold: long after no weapons were found, a third of Americans believed they had been.
Propaganda (n.) went out of style as a word only because the totalitarians made it look bad; the practice carried on as public relations.
Regime change (n.) does not mean the regime the people might prefer but one the conqueror imposes and calls democratic — just as Russia installed "people's democracies."
Regime change (n.) is no new doctrine: the Cuban missile crisis grew directly out of a terrorist campaign to topple Castro.
Regime change (n.) had a constructive route in Iraq: lift the sanctions, give people their lives back, and let them choose their own government, as Romanians and Filipinos did.
Regime change (n.) by outside force is unjustified unless a people first had the chance to overthrow the tyrant themselves, as others did with dictators the West propped up.
A Pretext (n.) is what an invasion waits for; when bombings fail to provoke one, any outrage will do, even one by the enemy's own enemies.
Pretext (n.) can be manufactured: a liberal adviser proposed luring Castro into a raid on Haiti so that "the moral issue would be clouded."
A Pretext (n.) can be changed daily when the goal never changes: we will do what we choose, giving whatever reason happens to be on hand.
A Pretext (n.) that collapses is replaced by another, while the obvious motive is never named — in Iraq, permanent bases at the heart of the world's energy.
Missile defense (n.) is not a shield but a spear's companion: it insulates the homeland from reprisal so force can be used freely abroad.
Missile defense (n.) is not about defense but offense, as its liberal champion admitted — and that is exactly why it was wanted.
Missile defense (n.) is a Trojan horse: wheeled in as protection, carrying the weaponization of space inside.