Knowledge (n.) is governed not by a theory of knowledge, but by a theory of discursive practice.
Knowledge (n.) is irreducibly double since it involves at one and the same time speaking and seeing, language and light. Knowledge is inescapably made problematic by the fact that 'we do not see what we speak about, nor do we speak about what we see'.
Knowledge (n.) is necessarily linked to the essential forms of cruelty.
Knowledge (n.) is never a neutral accumulation. There is always a 'will to knowledge,' a drive to gain knowledge of certain things, and to gain it in a particular way.
Knowledge (n.) is no longer tasked to dig out the ancient 'word' from the hidden, its job is not to fabricate a language as a language of calculation.
Knowledge (n.) is not for knowing: Knowledge is for cutting.
Knowledge (n.) is not made for understanding... it is made for cutting.
Knowledge's (n.) unthought, unarticulated background condition it is power.
Knowledge (n.) is the visible side of power.