Interpretation (n.) is a development of understanding involving an articulation of what the understanding understands.
Interpretation (n.) is grounded in the idea that we always already understand to some extent (or else we could not even begin). As such, it is always a move only from relatively little understanding to better understanding.
Interpretation (n.) is never a presuppositions apprehending of something presented to us.
Interpretation (n.) is never presuppositionless, but is always grounded in advance in a prior conception located in the fore-structure of the understanding.
Interpretation (n.) is a process whereby we must begin with certain faulty interpretations in order to arrive at a genuine interpretation.
Interpretation (n.) is the 'laying out' of the place of things in the world as we understand it.
Interpretation (n.) is the articulation of dasein's pre-ontological understanding of being. As such, it is essentially a matter of language, and in particular a matter of philosophical language.
Interpretation (n.) is the laying out of the 'as-structure', that is, in our everyday dealings, we 'see' things as a table, a door, a carriage or a bridge.
Interpretation (n.) is to capture the being of the entity despite its tendency to cover things up.
Interpretation (n.) is the act of developing one's understanding of something and illuminating the thing. For example, when I learn that a gesture means that something is too expensive, I have interpreted the gesture.
Interpretation (n.) is an open-ended, ongoing process which, as long as it continues, provides more insight than any static system ever can; when it comes to a halt, it becomes no more than a petrified set of concepts, a way of thinking that is no longer willing to revise its presuppositions.