Logic (n.) is defined by the ground rule for all thinking is that contradiction should be avoided but how then can we go about 'tampering with the rule of 'logic'''.
Logic (n.) is not the formal, symbolic logic of frege and russell, but the study concerning 'the conditions of knowing in general.' In other words, logic is the 'theory of theory,' the 'doctrine of science', or the science of the primally theoretical. It is epistemology.
Logic (n.) strives to avoid contradiction as its ground rule, but this needn't be the case. We can 'tamper with the rule of 'logic'.
Logic (n.) is utterly swept away by the whirlwind of a more original form of questioning: “why is there something rather than nothing?”
Logic (n.) is always grounded in metaphysics or ontology, not the other way around; possible only on the basis of a deeper human transcendence of the world.
Logic (n.) is capable only of dealing with the surface phenomena of meaning - theoretical propositions. These would be meaningless without the more primordial unconcealment that accompanies our existence.