Definitions HQ

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠any discipline (not just the hard sciences) engaged in the systematic study of phenomena.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠not to be described as factual, experimental, and measuring. Rather the fundamental feature must consist in what rules and determines the basic movement or involvement of science itself, the manner of working with the things and the metaphysical projection of the thingness of things.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠the totality established through an interconnection of true propositions.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠problematic in that is presupposes nature as its object, only rarely does chemistry ask what a chemical is or geometry ask what a shape is.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠representative of many specialized forms of metaphysics, each of them believing in certain fundamental realities from which everything else is derived.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠able to objectify some layer of reality that was somehow already vaguely revealed beforehand; if it had not already been revealed in some vague, preliminary way, science would never have been able to discover it. Science slowly objectifies the things that human Dasein is already loosely aware of, and makes it the object of an organized theory.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠comprised of a three-fold structure: (a) relatedness: it is related to the world (past, already given to us); (b) attitude: it is always possessed of a specific attitude (future, marked by possibility) (c) irruption: it is marked by a kind of violence, a breaking-in (present).

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠a kind of external representation or calculation that reduces things to their utility or their measurability by humans.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠grounded in an inferior methodology because in order to gain knowledge of things, science has to objectify them, to character them, to oversimplify them. To objectify things means to “de-live” them.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠wrongheaded in that to treat something scientifically is to convert it from a mysterious and multifaceted thing into a concept whose basic features can be clearly listed in a glossary.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠not able to think insofar as it operates by interpreting things as occurrences, not as events.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠wrongheaded in that it always fails to do justice to the things in the world, which are dark and stormy events locked in a network with other such events, rather than crystal-clear sets of knowable properties.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠reflective of a mode of the mathematization of nature and the dominance of questions of method in all pursuit of truth.

Science (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠not problematic in the way it simply represents an object-world but more fundamentally of a general stance towards entities: that of exploitation.