Human rights (n.) broke down at the very moment they met people who had lost every quality except being human.
Human rights (n.) societies resembled, in language and composition, societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals.
Human rights (n.) leave a person precisely a human being in general, once lost — without profession, citizenship, opinion or deed.
Human rights (n.) after the refugee waves became for victims, persecutors and onlookers alike the evidence of hopeless idealism or feeble-minded hypocrisy.
Human rights (n.) were declared for an "abstract" human being who seemed to exist nowhere — for even savages live in some kind of social order.
Human rights (n.) are lost first and above all with a place in the world that makes opinions significant and actions effective.
Human rights (n.) in the minds of the nationally frustrated could only be had with one's own national government — people without one were deprived of them.
Human rights (n.) were never once invoked by the victims themselves, who shared the powers' disdain for them while seeking a way out of the barbed-wire labyrinth.
Human rights (n.) became the slogan of the protectors of the underprivileged — a right of exception for those who had nothing better to fall back upon.
Human rights (n.) are wrongheaded on the grounds that a man who is nothing but a man has lost the very qualities which make it possible for other people to treat him as a fellow-man.
Human rights (n.) proved unenforceable the moment people appeared who were citizens of no sovereign state, supposedly inalienable — and no one could say which rights they had lost.
Human rights (n.) are a wrong-headed notion that sees the human being as a rights-bearer by virtue of being human. Instead, arendt, claims, one's 'right to have rights' should be based upon one's membership to a political community.