Accumulation (n.) changes you unless it is money you pile up: piling up sheep makes you a shepherd, piling up slaves and land makes you a master.
Accumulation (n.) and the concentration of capital are at bottom a material means for raising productivity — and they breed a surplus population to match the surplus capital.
Accumulation (n.) flows on in proportion to the momentum capital already has, not in proportion to its rate of profit.
Accumulation (n.) is all that overproduction of capital means — not overproduction of individual commodities.
Accumulation (n.) becomes absolute the moment more capital yields no more profit than less did.
Accumulation (n.) looks, at a high level of productivity, less like the fruit of long ages of saving than the product of a short reproduction period, because value is set by what it would cost to reproduce today.
Accumulation (n.) stripped of its capitalist form is the use of part of the additional labour to form new means of production, and under capitalism it simply means the capitalist, not the worker, disposes of that extra labour.
Accumulation (n.) begins as a means to the capitalist's enrichment and ends as a necessity: the constant enlargement of his capital becomes the condition for keeping it at all.
Accumulation (n.) changes the make-up of capital: what is laid out on means of production keeps growing, while what is spent on labour shrinks relatively and often absolutely.
Accumulation (n.) is a mere handful beside the mighty river of yearly production that rolls on into the forgotten ocean of consumption — yet the vulgar eye is struck only by the handful.
Accumulation (n.) pictured as happening everywhere at once — selling without buying — seems to make exchange impossible: everyone wants to sell in order to hoard, and nobody wants to buy.
Accumulation (n.) at the expense of consumption is an illusion that contradicts the essence of capitalism, for it assumes the system's purpose is consumption rather than the grabbing of surplus-value and its capitalization.