Production (n.) does not occur without a need, but consumption reproduces the need.
Production (n.) is that in whose pores lives usury, just as the Gods of epicurus lived in the space between the worlds.
Production (n.) by an isolated individual outside society is as absurd as language developing without people living together and talking to one another.
Production (n.) is also consumption: the worker uses himself up developing his faculties, as procreation consumes vital powers.
Production (n.) produces not only an object for the individual but an individual for the object.
Production (n.) turns its natural conditions historical: what is a natural prerequisite in one period was a historical result in another.
Production (n.) is never just people working on nature; they work upon one another too, and only within their social relations does their influence on nature operate.
Production (n.) under capital is production only for capital, not the reverse, and the means of production are not means for an ever-widening life of the producers.
Production (n.) comes to a standstill not where needs are satisfied but where the production and realization of profit impose it.
Production (n.) produces not only things but the relations of production themselves — and with them the very people who carry it on.
Production (n.) is the real metamorphosis of capital; buying and selling are merely formal ones, where equal values only change places.
Production (n.) as capitalism develops has its scale set less and less by the immediate demand for the product and more and more by the size of the capital and its drive to grow.
Production (n.) disappears in the finished commodity, surviving only as a strange concrete property of the thing: it possesses value.
Production (n.) on a social basis, were it to replace capitalist production, would still need the same constant to and fro of coal, iron and machines between the points of production — only distributed by need instead of by ownership shares.