Vulgar economics (n.) merely translates the notions of the competition-enslaved capitalist into ostensibly theoretical language and then sets out to prove them.
Vulgar economics (n.) wants commerce and banking to spring from production as such — so that merchants and bankers would be as eternal as cattle-raising is to eating meat.
Vulgar economics (n.) welcomes interest-bearing capital as a godsend, because in it the source of profit can no longer be seen.
Vulgar economics (n.) repeats, when it is flat, stale and false, what was once new, profound and justified at an earlier stage.
Vulgar economics (n.) does nothing but interpret, systematize and turn into apologetics the notions of people trapped inside bourgeois relations — and feels most at home exactly where things are most absurd.
Vulgar economics (n.) answers every riddle with 'the growth of capital' — like a chemist who explains the soil's extra carbon by the growth of agriculture.
Vulgar economics (n.) shows its characteristic cretinism by mistaking the capitalist's spending of his revenue — which never enters the circuit of capital — for the characteristic circuit of capital.
Vulgar economics (n.) came in through the door Smith opened when he turned revenues from parts of value into the original sources of all value.