Profit (n.) rises in exactly the degree that wages fall, and falls as they rise: the two stand in inverse proportion.
Profit (n.) from the state of the economy is, by Wagner's own admission, nothing but gambling winnings, matched by gambling losses.
Profit (n.) is the twin of wages: because the price of labour-power appears at one pole as wages, surplus-value appears at the other as profit.
Profit (n.) can be made while selling below value: anywhere between cost price and value, the capitalist still pockets a slice of the surplus — the hidden room in which competition plays.
Profit (n.) cannot come from production, on Torrens's account, or it would already be a cost, and cannot come from exchange, on Ramsay's account, unless it exists beforehand, so the chase goes in a circle.
Profit (n.) explained as selling above value is the phlogiston of economics, a substance of negative weight.
Profit (n.) comes from the fact that the capitalist has something to sell for which he has not paid.
Profit (n.) gives the capitalist an inkling of its source in the production process, his greed for others' labour-time betraying it, but the inkling is a passing moment, drowned out by the market.
Profit (n.) is how surplus-value appears: a transformed shape that veils and obliterates its origin and its secret, which only analysis can sift back out.
Profit (n.) can rise in one factory because workers in another got more productive: the capitalist reaps the benefits of the whole social division of labour, including science.
Profit (n.) once averaged out across industries conceals its true nature not only from the capitalist, who has an interest in deceiving himself, but also from the worker.
Profit (n.) seems to the capitalist to be created by grounds for compensation — risk, slow turnover, distant markets — when they only settle each capitalist's equal claim on the common booty.
Profit (n.) can grow by half while its rate falls by half — and on a capitalist basis it not only can but must.
Profit (n.) keeps its place 'like an incumbent body on the swelling or sinking tide' of prices.
Profit (n.) is not doubled by the same money being capital for two people; it can serve both only by being divided — and the lender's part is called interest.
Profit (n.) looks, to the capitalist, like wages of superintendence — a higher wage for complex labour and for paying the wages — and he forgets that his function is to produce unpaid labour.
Profit (n.) seems to derive from the antithetical form of its own two parts — as if the division created the thing divided; but profit is produced before any division takes place.
Profit (n.) once function and ownership come apart in the joint-stock company stands exposed as simply the appropriation of other people's surplus labour.
Profit (n.) is in general the appropriation of the nation's labour — which is why the bourgeois economist is not shocked when a national saving appears as a private profit.
Profit (n.) under rent in kind, the name given in anticipation to what the producer keeps, grows up behind the back of rent, and it is rent that sets its limit.