Distribution (n.) is the reverse side of production: how you take part in making things decides the form in which you share in them.
Distribution (n.) before it is a sharing-out of products is a sharing-out of the means of production, and of people among the kinds of production.
Distribution (n.) is only a consequence of how the conditions of production are distributed; to make socialism turn on distribution is vulgar socialism borrowed from bourgeois economists.
Distribution (n.) into profit, rent and wages creates none of the substance it divides; it presupposes value already made by social labour — yet to the agents it looks as if each source makes its own share.
Distribution (n.) looks identical across different societies only if you abstract from all their differences and cling to their unity.
Distribution (n.) seen as historical while production is held eternal is a criticism of bourgeois economics still timid and restrained — confusing social production with the labour of an isolated man without social aids.
Distribution (n.) that matters is not the sharing out of consumer goods but the prior sharing out of the means of production — objects piled on one side, bare labour-power isolated on the other.