Competition (n.) leads two great armies into the field against each other, each also fighting within its own ranks, and the army with less infighting wins.
Competition (n.) turns against the capitalist every weapon he forges against his rivals: all his effort wins him only the obligation to produce more in the same time.
Competition (n.) is an industrial war with the peculiarity that battles are won less by recruiting than by discharging the army: the generals vie over who can dismiss the most soldiers.
Competition (n.) is mutual cheating: for each capitalist, the surplus-value he pockets depends as much on swindling other dealers as on exploiting his workers — though the cheating only reshuffles what labour made.
Competition (n.) makes each individual an atom in a mass: the stronger side acts as a united whole, the weaker as each for himself — devil take the hindmost.
Competition (n.) by one cheaper producer forces all the rest to adopt his methods, and so drags the socially necessary labour down to a new and lower level.
Competition (n.) is where everything appears upside down: what shows on the surface — and in the heads of the agents — is the very reverse and antithesis of the concealed inner core.
Competition (n.) does not show the values that govern production; it shows profits that seem to have nothing to do with how much living labour was used.
Competition (n.) while profits are being shared is a practical freemasonry of the capitalist class, and once losses must be shared it becomes a struggle of enemy brothers.
Competition (n.) does not cause the fall in the profit rate; the fall in the profit rate provokes competition.
Competition (n.) can equalize profit to one level, but nothing in it can say whether that level is 15 per cent or 1,500.
Competition (n.) makes the surplus profit from better machines or larger scale temporary: the exceptional method becomes universal, and the profit vanishes.
Competition (n.) is the sphere of accident, where the inner law shows itself only in large numbers and so remains invisible and incomprehensible to the agents themselves.
Competition (n.) is saddled with explaining all of the economists' irrationalities, when the economists were supposed to explain competition.