Science (n.) is a cold and dry mode of inquiry that sees everywhere only problems of knowledge.
Science (n.) is a mode of inquiry that sees everywhere only problems of knowledge. It is a metaphysics in its own right and a systematization of knowledge that has led men down fallacious paths.
Science (n.) is a perfectly straight line, a true circle, and absolute measure.
Science (n.) is an offense to the modesty of all real women in that it feels like an attempt to peek under one's dress.
Science (n.) is not the furtherance of knowledge, but of ability. It eventuates an increase in energy, in reasoning capacity, in toughness of endurance: To this extent it is invaluable, with regard to everything one will afterwards do, once to have been a man of science.
Science (n.) is similar to art in that for both fields, everyday things seem to them new and attractive.
Science (n.) has no consideration for ultimate purposes, any more than Nature has, but sometimes, like nature, it unintentionally furthers the usefulness and welfare of man.
Science (n.) surely never would have arisen had there not first been magicians, alchemist, astrologers and wizards, who thirsted and hungered after abscondite and forbidden powers.
Science (n.) is responsible for the fact that man is now more evil and mistrustful than ever, for, prior to its birth, he had for so long been a thoroughly credulous animal.
Science (n.) has been promoted by virtue of three errors: that it is a way to understand God (i.e. newton)... that it was to lead to the absolute unity of knowledge, morality, and happiness (i.e. voltaire) and that it was a truly innocent domain in which in which man's evil impulses had no part whatever (i.e. Spinoza).
Science (n.) may be only a fear and an excuse in the face of pessimism — a delicate self-defence against the Truth; morally, cowardice; unmorally, a clever trick.
Science (n.) causes a concept-quake that robs man of his belief in the enduring and eternal; life then caves in, like a house built on volcanic land in fear and trembling.
Science (n.) study the canvas and the paint but not the picture; to understand the picture one must divine the painter — without a total picture of life they are threads that nowhere come to an end.
Science (n.) is related to wisdom as virtuousness is to holiness: cold and dry, without love, knowing nothing of a deep feeling of inadequacy and longing.
Science (n.) gives much joy to the researcher and very little to the learner — and as its truths grow commonplace like the two-times table, interest in truth will cease and illusion reclaim its ground.
Science (n.) demands an instinctive mistrust of devious thinking; without it, someone can know all the facts and still fall in love with the first hypothesis that enters his head.
Science (n.) is the long old fear of wild animals — and of the inner beast — refined at last, made spiritual and intellectual.
Science (n.) is not the opposite of the ascetic ideal; where it still inspires passion, love and suffering, it is its latest and noblest form.
Science (n.) is the original sin, the taboo of all taboos: 'Thou shalt not know' — everything else follows.
Science (n.) is hated by morality because it takes seriously things that have nothing to do with good and evil — morality counts concern with plants and stars a squandering.