Sexuality (n.) stripped of all spiritual transcendence, as in de Sade, becomes a mechanical exercise without any sensual passion.
Sexuality (n.) does not follow the pleasure principle; it appears as a break, an intrusion of excess enjoyment upsetting the psyche's balance.
Sexuality (n.) is not natural; it is excessive by definition, the mark of humans denaturalized by original sin.
Sexuality (n.) is inherently patho-logical, early Soviet pedagogy held — it stains cold logic with pathos; such outbursts are closer to the truth than aseptic tolerance.
Sexuality (n.) is not the sin that caused the Fall but its punishment: God answered Adam's pride with a drive exceeding all function, which no will can master.
Sexuality (n.) is not what is invisible in the discourses that control it; what is invisible is the sexualization of the very work of control — our own participation in what we police.
Sexuality (n.) is not a traumatic substantial Thing but the formal structure of failure: any activity that misses its goal and loops — squeezing a friend's palm repeatedly instead of shaking it — is automatically sexualized.
Sexuality (n.) is what separates us from the real Real of science — neither illusion nor the wall of language, but another Real: an irreducible failure, an antagonism with no common denominator, enjoyment gained only against a fundamental loss.