Affirmation (n.) needs a fiancée: hence Dionysus needs Ariadne.
Affirmation (n.) is in its essence difference, and difference is in its essence affirmation.
Affirmation (n.) is a sad grotesque phantom shaking the chains of the negative, as long as the negative reigns.
Affirmation (n.) is in its essence multiple and affirms difference; negation trails beside it as a powerless double.
Affirmation (n.) is not action but the power of becoming active; negation is not mere reaction but a becoming reactive.
Affirmation (n.) is not taking on the burden of what is, but releasing, setting free what lives: to affirm is to unburden.
Affirmation (n.) is not to bear, carry, or harness oneself to that which exist, but on the contrary to unburden, unharness, and set free that which lives.
Affirmation (n.) of everything is the hard part: for each thing we must find the special means by which it ceases to be negative.
Affirmation (n.) is necessary and sufficient to create two negations — the exact opposite of the dialectic, which needs two negations to fake one affirmation.
Affirmation (n.) for Zarathustra's Ass is to bear: divine values, human values, and when nothing is left, the weight of its own tired muscles.
Affirmation (n.) is not opposed to negation — that would put the negative inside it; it differs from negation: the enjoyment and play of its own difference, as negation is the labour of opposition.
Affirmation (n.) is not bearing: to take something on as a weight is a false affirmation that tends only the products of nihilism — which makes Kant and Hegel philosophical labourers.